|
|
Post by panzerman on Jan 11, 2012 14:14:04 GMT -8
Hopefully photo downloaded this time! John  Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by maurizio on Jan 13, 2012 2:27:32 GMT -8
John,
why do you consider earis a subspecies of telesilaus? I demonstrated* it is a distinct species, and its taxonomical status is accepted by Lamas (2004), among others.
I can send you a PDF of the paper, if you want.
*Bollino, M. & Vitale, F., 1999 - Taxonomical notes on Protesilaus earis (Rothschild & Jordan, 1906) bona species and illustration of the female. Lambillionea,XCIX (2):322-326
|
|
|
|
Post by panzerman on Jan 13, 2012 20:30:16 GMT -8
Maurizio: I agree with you that earis is a full sp. When, I made the data label, I followed Tyler, Brown book, which I now know has many mistakes. John  |
|
